Communities often face new challenges as soon as they become more diverse, especially when the communities themselves face problems unique with their own demographics. The aspect of range in a metropolis or a vicinity can be very vibrant; changes in society, economic advancement and even contest and racial have implications for the smoothness of a community. This paper documents identifies five key elements that confuse the governance of diversity. Specifically, we all argue that these elements challenge the legitimacy of technology adoption, challenge the social capital of community organizations as well as the management of diversity and promote the politics of difference. All of us propose five key versions that challenge the way a residential area determines technology adoption, investigates the purpose of businesses and people in stimulating https://la-technologie.fr/2020/06/18/technologie-et-communaute-par-salle-du-conseil-dadministration variety and explores the relationship between technologies and communities.
The actual paper identifies five primary factors intended for the current design of community technology usage. These factors are the demographics for the community, scientific competence and innovation, everyday and formal organization and political overall economy. We argue that in most cases, the adoption of community technology has been powerful when IT businesses have designed early results from their own earlier experiences and organizational capital. Nevertheless , we also suggest that these same models may be modified to take into account the different features of particular neighborhoods, for example , low-income estates-mit -US, high-needs tract -US.
The present analysis challenges the legitimacy than it firm plagiarism of community building and finds that this firms hardly ever constructed from early results from their own past experiences. Instead, we believe that must be important for organizations to depend on their company, technical and cultural capital to create early on results for community production projects. Finally, we suggest that the personal capital of an community may also be important for driving a car its well-known adoption of community technology and community building. All of us further predict that the politics overall economy of a community may also be essential understanding the effects of various community technologies.